FENWICK v. KAY AMERICAN JEEP, INC.


136 N.J. Super. 114 (1975)

344 A.2d 785

MILLICENT H. FENWICK, DIRECTOR OF THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. KAY AMERICAN JEEP, INC., RESPONDENT, AND JOSEPH FRIEDMAN, T/A FRIEDMAN ASSOCIATES, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 5, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Donald T. Okner argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Margolis & Bergstein, attorneys).

Mr. Douglas J. Harper, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, LYNCH and ALLCORN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by ALLCORN, J.A.D.

In July 1973, under the authority delegated to him to "promulgate such rules and regulations * * * as may be necessary" to "accomplish the objectives and to carry out the duties prescribed" by the Consumers Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq., the Attorney General adopted a set of rules "concerning motor vehicle advertising practices." 5 N.J.R. 152 (2), 5 N.J.R. 290 (b); N.J.A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases