TELMAR COM. v. PROCACCINO


48 A.D.2d 189 (1975)

In the Matter of Telmar Communications Corp., Petitioner, v. Mario A. Procaccino et al., Constituting The State Tax Commission, Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

June 5, 1975


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leon D. Schneider for petitioner.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Martin J. Siegel and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

HERLIHY, P. J., SWEENEY, LARKIN and REYNOLDS, JJ., concur.


KANE, J.

Section 210 of the Tax Law provides several methods for computing the corporate franchise tax and requires the taxpayer to select and use that method which produces the highest return for the State. Respondent concluded that petitioner failed to do this in the fiscal year which ended March 31, 1971 and assessed a deficiency against it contending that the appropriate method required petitioner to pay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases