TRIUMPH HOSIERY MILLS v. COMTH

No. 1609 C.D. 1973.

21 Pa.Commw. 186 (1975)

Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc., Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

September 5, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry J. Rubin, with him Krekstein, Rubin & Lasday, for appellant.

Eugene J. Anastasio, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Jack H. Harper, with him Samuel C. Harry, and, of counsel, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, for amicus curiae, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation.

N. David Rahal, with him Roy J. Keefer, and Metzger, Hafer, Keefer, Thomas and Wood, for amicus curiae, Chicago Bridge & Iron Company.

Robert L. Weldon, with him Sherill T. Moyer, Frank A. Sinon, and Rhoads, Sinon & Reader, for amicus curiae, American Can Company.

Argued June 5, 1975, before President Judge BOWMAN and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR., MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT.


OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE BOWMAN, September 5, 1975:

Triumph Hosiery Hills, Inc. (appellant) is a New York corporation which transacts a part of its business in Pennsylvania. By exercising its privilege to engage in business within this state, appellant is necessarily subject to the imposition of the Pennsylvania corporate net income tax.1

Subsequent to appellant's filing of its Pennsylvania corporate net income tax return for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases