GOURLEY v. CITY OF NAPA

Docket No. 33629.

48 Cal.App.3d 156 (1975)

121 Cal. Rptr. 290

OSMER B. GOURLEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF NAPA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

March 18, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William T. Hays, Seth J. Kelsey and Edward T. Flaherty for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Davis, Cowell & Bowe and Alan C. Davis as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Frank L. Dunlap, City Attorney, and W. Scott Snowden, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

Richard L. Knickerbocker, City Attorney (Santa Monica), Rosario Perry, Deputy City Attorney, Chalmers E. Lones, City Attorney (Signal Hill), Warren J. Lynch, City Attorney (Salinas), and Raymond M. Haight, Assistant City Attorney, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

TAYLOR, P.J.

On this appeal by plaintiff, O.B. Gourley, from that portion of a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate, the only question presented is whether the respondent, City of Napa, violated Government Code section 21025.5 when it refused to pay Gourley full salary pursuant to Labor Code section 4850 for the 12-month period that followed the date of his industrial injury on December 19, 1971. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases