STATE, EX REL. CORRIGAN v. VOINOVICH

No. 75-32.

41 Ohio St. 2d 157 (1975)

THE STATE, EX REL. CORRIGAN ET AL., v. VOINOVICH, AUD.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 5, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Mr. John L. Dowling, Mr. Thomas P. Gill, Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Mr. George I. Meisel and Mr. David N. Rowlinson, for relators.

Messrs. Walter, Haverfield, Buescher & Chockley and Mr. Loyal V. Buescher, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

The initial question posed in this case is whether an original action in mandamus in this court is proper. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and should be resorted to only where there is no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. Where, however, the public interest makes it necessary that an issue involving the expenditure and possible loss of large sums of public money be resolved without delay, an action in mandamus will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases