1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 23 Ariz.
  5. 23 Ariz. App. 169 (1975)
 

STATE v. BELL

Nos. 1 CA-CR 665, 1 CA-CR 673.

23 Ariz. App. 169 (1975)

531 P.2d 545

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Roy Sylvester BELL and Linda Jane Bell, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

February 6, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen., by Stanley L. Patchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

Karman & Brumage by Lloyd D. Brumage, Casa Grande, for appellants.

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

This appeal requires an interpretation of Rule 32, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., dealing with post-conviction relief.

On December 20, 1973, appellants Roy S. Bell and Linda Jane Bell entered pleas of guilty to one amended charge each of unarmed robbery pursuant to a plea bargain whereby charges of possession of prescription only drugs for purposes of sale, not upon a valid prescription; possession of dangerous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases