1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 523 F.2d
  5. 523 F.2d 1371 (1975)
 

MEAD v. RETAIL CLERKS INT. ASS'N, ETC.

Nos. 72-3043, 72-3044.

523 F.2d 1371 (1975)

James MEAD and Roger Mead, dba Mead's Market, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 839, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellant. James MEAD and Roger Mead, dba Mead's Market, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 839, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 2, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry S. Jellison, Davis, Cowell & Bowe (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant in No. 72-3043 and for appellee in No. 72-3044.

Ted R. Frame, Frame & Courtney (argued), Coalinga, Cal., for appellee in No. 72-3043 and for appellant in No. 72-3044.

Before BROWNING and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL, District Judge.

OPINION

BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

James and Roger Mead, former partners in Mead's Market, a grocery store, sued under section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 187,1 to recover damages allegedly sustained as a result of a strike conducted by Local 839 of the Retail Clerks International Association in part to compel the Meads to agree to a clause prohibited by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases