DAVID BAIRD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 30, 1975.
December 30, 1975.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
COUNSEL
Dryden, Harrington & Swartz, George J. Franscell and Peter Abrahams for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Burt Pines, City Attorney, John B. Rice, Assistant City Attorney, and Barbara E. Miller, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.
OPINION
COBEY, J.
(1) The sole issue on this appeal in a mandamus proceeding by four police officers (hereafter called petitioners) is whether the respondent police chief could properly demote them within their civil service classification of police officer for a nondisciplinary reason from police officer III to police officer II without complying with the formal board of rights procedures provided in section 202 of the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
