1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 526 F.2d
  5. 526 F.2d 1174 (1975)
 

BAHAMAS AGR. INDUSTRIES LTD. v. RILEY STOKER CORP.

Nos. 75-1148 to 75-1150.

526 F.2d 1174 (1975)

BAHAMAS AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED, and FM, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RILEY STOKER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. BAILEY METER COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., and Peabody Engineering, Third-Party Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided December 12, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Zelle, Robins, Davis & Lyons, Robert M. Wattson, Minneapolis, Minn., Thomas L. Dalrymple, Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder, Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants in 75-1148.

Thomas J. Manahan, Finn, Manahan & Pietrykowski, Jamille G. Jamra, Eastman, Stichter, Smith & Bergman, Toledo, Ohio, for defendant-appellee in 75-1148.

Lawrence Zelle, Minneapolis, Minn., for Bahamas and FM, Ltd.

Thomas J. Manahan, Toledo, Ohio, for Riley Stoker Corp.

Jamille G. Jamra, Toledo, Ohio, for Bailey Meter Co.

Thomas J. Manahan, Finn, Manahan & Pietrykowski, Toledo, Ohio, for appellant in 75-1149.

R. Paul Wingart, Toledo, Ohio, Lawrence Zelle, Robert M. Wattson, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellees in 75-1149 and 75-1150.

Jamille G. Jamra, Eastman, Stichter, Smith & Bergman, Toledo, Ohio, for appellant in 75-1150.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge, and HARVEY, District Judge.

WEICK, Circuit Judge.

Bahamas Agricultural Industries Limited (BAIL) and its insurer, plaintiffs-appellants, have appealed from a judgment of the District Court entered upon a directed verdict in favor of defendant, Bailey Meter Company (Bailey Meter), and from a judgment setting aside a jury verdict in their favor and dismissing their complaint against defendant, Riley Stoker Corporation (Riley Stoker), for an alleged inconsistency between the jury's verdict and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases