MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC. v. MINNESOTA MIN. & MFG. CO.

No. 738, Docket 74-2413.

521 F.2d 1178 (1975)

MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided August 4, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter D. Ames, Washington, D. C. (James H. Marsh, Jr., Gary M. Hoffman, Washington, D. C., Thomas J. Hanifin, Jr., David T. M. Murphy, Niagara Falls, N. Y., and John E. Howells, Washington, D. C.), for plaintiff-appellant.

Edward A. Haight, Chicago, Ill. (Haight, Hofeldt, Davis & Jambor, Chicago, Ill., Raichle, Banning, Weiss & Halpern, Frank G. Raichle, and Ralph L. Halpern, Buffalo, N. Y., Alexander, Sell, Steldt & DeLaHunt, Stanley G. DeLa-Hunt, Gary L. Griswold, and G. Brian Pingel, St. Paul, Minn., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, HAYS and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.


LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff, Moore Business Forms, Inc. (Moore) appeals from an order of the district court for the Western District, John T. Curtin, Chief Judge, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) in this action for patent infringement. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. Background.

Moore is the assignee of United States Patent No. 3,016,308 (the Macaulay patent),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases