1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 388 F.Supp.
  5. 388 F.Supp. 1294 (1975)
 

JENNINGS v. BOENNING & COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 72-427.

388 F.Supp. 1294 (1975)

Helen M. JENNINGS v. BOENNING & COMPANY and Boenning & Scattergood, Inc.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

January 29, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Fackenthal, Henderson, Wetherill & O'Hey, Norristown, Pa., for plaintiff.

L. Carter Anderson, Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRODERICK, District Judge.

On March 1, 1972, this "Pearlstein" doctrine case was brought by the plaintiff under the theory that the defendant brokerage house should have liquidated certain unsettled bond transactions as required by the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation "T"1 and that the failure of the brokerage house to so liquidate resulted in losses being suffered by the plaintiff. Plaintiff now seeks...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases