ZWEIG v. HEARST CORPORATION

Nos. 74-1979, 74-2028.

521 F.2d 1129 (1975)

Richard L. ZWEIG and Muriel Bruno, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The HEARST CORPORATION, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Jerry GREENFIELD, Individually and as a representative of a class of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HEARST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Certiorari Denied December 8, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip M. Brown (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stephen G. Contopulos (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before KOELSCH and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and McNICHOLS, District Judge.


Certiorari Denied December 8, 1975. See 96 S.Ct. 469.

OPINION

McNICHOLS, District Judge:

The above-captioned actions have, by prior order, been consolidated for appeal. The appellee in each case is the same and the controversies arose out of a single transaction. Appellants rely on precisely identical grounds for reversal.

For the purposes of this appeal, jurisdiction in the District Court was founded on 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 CFR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases