1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 69 Wis.2d
  5. 69 Wis.2d 92 (1975)
 

STATE v. GEORGE

Nos. State 157, 158.

69 Wis.2d 92 (1975)

230 N.W.2d 253

STATE, Appellant, v. GEORGE, Respondent. STATE, Appellant, v. TOLLEFSON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 16, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by J. Douglas Haag, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Patrick R. Doyle of La Crosse.

BEILFUSS, J.

Prior to the preliminary hearings, counsel for the defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaints upon the grounds of duplicity, multiplicity, vagueness and indefiniteness. The trial court dismissed all but count five of the George complaint and all but counts two, five and ten of the Tollefson complaint.

The statute under which George and Tollefson were charged is as follows:

"945.03 Commercial gambling. Whoever intentionally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases