1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 533 F.2d
  5. 533 F.2d 1081 (1975)
 

NOBLE v. MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS

Nos. 72-2021, 72-2042.

533 F.2d 1081 (1975)

Willard M. NOBLE and Etta M. Noble, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS, a corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Willard M. Noble and Etta M. Noble, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS, a corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Haas (argued), Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants in 72-2021, for defendants-appellees in 72-2042.

Timothy H. Fine (argued), of the Law Offices of G. Joseph Bertain, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees in 72-2021, for plaintiffs-appellants in 72-2042.

Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and GRAY, District Judge.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1976. See 537 F.2d 1030.

OPINION

BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

Willard Noble and his wife, Etta, were distributors of the Sacramento Bee newspaper. Their distributorship was cancelled. They brought this private antitrust action against McClatchy Newspapers, publisher of the Bee, and seven individuals.1

Three claims are at issue on these appeals: First, that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases