Eddie Mitchell TASBY et al.
v.
Dr. Nolan ESTES, General Superintendent, Dallas Independent School District, et al.
Donald E. Curry et al., Intervenors.
United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 11, 1975.
December 11, 1975.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Edward B. Cloutman, III, Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy & Baab, Inc., Sylvia M. Demarest, Director, Dallas Legal Services Foundation, Inc., Dallas, Tex., Melvyn Leventhal, New York City, Vilma S. Martinez, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., San Francisco, Cal., and Albert H. Kauffman, San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiffs.
Warren Whitham, Spafford, Gay & Whitham and Mark Martin, Strasburger, Price, Kelton, Martin & Unis, Dallas, Tex., for defendants except Highland Park ISD and Board of Trustees of HPISD.
Richard E. Gray, Jr., and Wm. T. Hankinson, Thompson, Knight, Simmons & Bullion, Dallas, Tex., for Highland Park ISD and Board.
Robert H. Mow, Jr., and Robert L. Blumenthal, Carrington, Coleman, Sloman, Johnson & Blumenthal, Dallas, Tex., for Donald Curry and others.
James G. Vetter, Jr., Elliott, Meer, Vetter, Denton, Bates & Cole, Dallas, Tex., for Oak Cliff Citizens.
N. Alex Bickley, City Atty., Dallas, Tex., for City of Dallas.
James T. Maxwell, pro se.
Martin Frost, Barber & Frost, and John W. Bryant, Dallas, Tex., for Dr. E. Thomas Strom and others.
E. Brice Cunningham, L. A. Bedford, Jr., and Fred J. Finch, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for Metropolitan Branches of NAACP.
James A. Donohoe and G. Duffield Smith, Jr., Gardere, Porter & DeHay, Dallas, Tex., for Brinegar and others.
United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.
The issue presented to this Court is whether the Highland Park Independent School District (HPISD) should be included in a desegregation plan designed to remedy the dual school system found to exist in the Dallas Independent School District (DISD).
Background
In its decision of July 23, 1975, the Court of Appeals affirmed this Court's 1971 ruling that elements of an unconstitutional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
