U. S. v. HIATT

No. 75-1801.

527 F.2d 1048 (1975)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calvin Vernon HIATT, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing February 26, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray B. Guterson (argued), Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellant.

Charles Pinnell, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before TRASK and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and PLUMMER, District Judge.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Hiatt appeals from his conviction on one count of conspiracy to violate the laws of the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371, particularly the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952.1 We affirm.

In early 1973, Daniel J. Seydel was the owner of a place of business in Seattle, Washington, which the appellant describes as a massage parlor and the government calls...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases