STATE v. ARRINGTON

No. 74-332.

42 Ohio St. 2d 114 (1975)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. ARRINGTON, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 16, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Simon L. Leis, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Joseph G. Carr, for appellee.

Mr. D. N. Bodley, for appellant.


O'NEILL, C. J.

The primary question presented in this appeal is whether the denial of defendant's motion for the transcript of the preliminary hearing was prejudicial error. This court finds that the motion should have been granted, and accordingly reverses the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I.

The new Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure are inapplicable to this appeal since the proceedings before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases