1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 23 Ariz.
  5. 23 Ariz. App. 121 (1975)
 

MEAD v. NACEY

No. 2 CA-CIV 1641.

23 Ariz. App. 121 (1975)

531 P.2d 166

Chester R. MEAD and Dorothy E. Mead, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Robert E. NACEY and Barbara M. Nacey, husband and wife, Nicholas Johnoff and Florence M. Johnoff, husband and wife, and Cynthia J. Van Auken, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

As Amended February 4, 1975.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1975.

Review Denied April 15, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lesher, Kimble, Rucker & Lindamood, P.C. by Edgar F. Rucker, Dorothy E. Mead, Tucson, for appellants.

Vincent E. Odgers, Tucson, for appellees Nacey.

Johnson, Hayes & Dowdall, Ltd. by John G. Stompoly, Tucson, for appellees Johnoff and Van Auken.

OPINION

KRUCKER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered against Chester R. Mead, individually, providing that he pay the plaintiffs, Robert E. Nacey and Barbara M. Nacey, the sum of $12,160.00. Appellants also appeal from a denial of their claim against the third-party defendants, cross-appellees, Nicholas Johnoff and Florence M. Johnoff, real estate brokers, and Cynthia J. Van Auken, an agent for Johnoff Realty, for breach of fiduciary duty.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases