Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice June 27, 1951 in the First Judicial Department. In this proceeding, it was charged that respondent, retained in a contractual dispute, falsely advised his client that the case was in arbitration, fabricated documentary evidence which he exhibited to his client to support this false assertion and, upon the client's discovery of the misrepresentation, refused to respond to inquiries of the client's new counsel....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
