1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 396 F.Supp.
  5. 396 F.Supp. 1004 (1975)
 

KOPETZKE v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, BD. OF SUPER.

No. C-74-0858 WHO.

396 F.Supp. 1004 (1975)

Maryclaire KOPETZKE et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, acting By and Through the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

May 12, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Berg, Fitzgerald, Johnson & Berg, San Francisco, Cal., Harlan K. Veal, Truce, Veal & Jackson, San Carlos, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Keith C. Sorenson, Dist. Atty., Henry A. Dietz, Asst. Dist. Atty., Redwood City, Cal., for defendants.

OPINION

ORRICK, District Judge.

This is an inverse condemnation action instituted by plaintiffs to redress an alleged taking of their real property by defendant County of San Mateo ("the County") without just compensation in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The trial was bifurcated, and the issue of liability was tried to the Court sitting without a jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases