1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 48 A.D.2d
  5. 48 A.D.2d 83 (1975)
 

MTR. OF BELL v. LIQ. AUTH.

48 A.D.2d 83 (1975)

In the Matter of David Bell, Appellant, v. New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent, v. Beal Properties, Inc., Appellant. (And Five Other Related Actions.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

May 22, 1975

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oppenheim & Drew (Stephen L. Oppenheim of counsel), for Beal Properties, Inc., appellant.

David Bell, appellant pro se.

William E. Bandon (Joseph J. Micare of counsel), for respondent.

HERLIHY, P. J., KANE, MAIN and REYNOLDS, JJ., concur.

SWEENEY, J.

Appellants operate bars in Sullivan County under licenses issued by respondent. Separate proceedings were instituted to revoke appellants' licenses for violating subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. The chief defense to the charges urged by appellants is that respondent has violated the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause by "selective enforcement" against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases