PATTERSON v. NEWSPAPER & MAIL DEL. U. OF N. Y. & VIC.

No. 626, Docket 74-2548.

514 F.2d 767 (1975)

John R. PATTERSON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NEWSPAPER AND MAIL DELIVERERS' UNION OF NEW YORK AND VICINITY et al., Defendants-Appellees. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NEWSPAPER AND MAIL DELIVERERS' UNION OF NEW YORK AND VICINITY et al., Defendants-Appellees, Dominick Ventre et al., Intervenors, James V. Larkin, Intervenor-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided March 20, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael B. Targoff, New York City (Willkie, Farr & Gallagher, Deborah M. Greenberg, Jack Greenberg, Edward F. Greene, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellees.

O'Donnell & Schwartz, New York City (Michael Klein, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Newspaper and Mail Deliverers' Union of New York and Vicinity.

Michael S. Devorkin, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Paul J. Curran, U. S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, Gerald A. Rosenberg, Asst. U. S. Atty., William A. Carey, Gen. Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Joseph T. Eddins, Associate Gen. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Beatrice Rosenberg, Attys., New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Herman H. Tarnow, New York City, for intervenor-appellant Larkin.

Before FEINBERG, MANSFIELD and OAKES, Circuit Judges.


MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

At issue on this appeal is the appropriateness of relief against discrimination in the employment of news deliverers. In the past we have been called upon to review relief granted in cases where discrimination has been established under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., including the use of minority percentage goals and affirmative hiring and promotion programs. See, e. g., Rios v. Enterprise Assn...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases