1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 392 F.Supp.
  5. 392 F.Supp. 883 (1975)
 

AIKEN v. LUSTINE CHEVROLET, INC.

Civ. A. No. 74-1665.

392 F.Supp. 883 (1975)

Mary L. AIKEN, Plaintiff, v. LUSTINE CHEVROLET, INC., and Lawrence Zapol, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 26, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard J. Koenick, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Gerard E. Mitchell, Washington, D. C., for defendant Lustine.

Howard M. Rensin, Hyattsville, Md., for defendant Zapol.

MEMORANDUM-ORDER

GASCH, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motions of both defendants to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for forum non conveniens. Defendant Zapol asks, in the alternative, that service be quashed as to him.

I. The Claim.

Plaintiff Mary L. Aiken is a resident of the District of Columbia. She alleges that defendant Lawrence Zapol, a salesman for defendant Lustine Chevrolet,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases