1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 406 F.Supp.
  5. 406 F.Supp. 862 (1975)
 

UNITED STATES v. SILVERMAN

Crim. No. 116-70.

406 F.Supp. 862 (1975)

UNITED STATES of America v. William SILVERMAN and Howard Silverman, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

December 18, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan L. Goldstein, U. S. Atty., by Joseph Burns, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N.J., for plaintiff.

Daniel H. Greenberg, New York City, by Mark Carlin, Jerome N. Frank Clinic, Yale Law School, New Haven, Conn., pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

COOLAHAN, Senior District Judge.

Defendants, William and Howard Silverman, move pursuant to Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or in the alternative, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to correct, vacate, or set aside their sentences. Both defendants were found guilty of conspiring to transport stolen securities, valued in excess of $100,000, in interstate commerce in violation of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases