NAPPER v. ANDERSON, HENLEY, SHIELDS, BRADFORD & PRITCHARD

No. 73-3746.

507 F.2d 723 (1975)

Jim L. NAPPER and wife, Jo Ann Napper, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ANDERSON, HENLEY, SHIELDS, BRADFORD & PRITCHARD, etc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 31, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Ben Howell, H. Averil Sweitzer, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

D. L. Case, Jack Pew, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and DYER, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 16, 1974, 5 Cir. 1974, 500 F.2d 634).

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of appellants' petition for rehearing, the panel adheres to its decision reported in 500 F.2d 634, that the district court properly dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction. Bell v. Hood, 1946, 327 U.S. 678

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases