1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 48 Cal.App.3d
  5. 48 Cal.App.3d 73 (1975)
 

HALE v. GEORGE A. HORMEL & CO.

Docket No. 13833.

48 Cal.App.3d 73 (1975)

121 Cal. Rptr. 144

EARL R. HALE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GEORGE A. HORMEL & COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

May 9, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Howser, Gertner & Brown, Robertson, Howser & Garland, Richard A. Brown, Jr., and Daniel P. Broderick for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Tuttle & Taylor, Antonio Rossmann, Kindel & Anderson and Edward J. Wallin for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KERRIGAN, J.

Earl Hale and his wife ("Hale") entered into a written agreement with Universal Marketing Enterprises Co. ("Universal") whereby Universal agreed to sell Hale 39 coin-operated vending machines for $25,000 and to find Hale suitable sites or locations for the machines in the Coachella Valley area (Palm Springs and environs). The machines were to be utilized to dispense 8-ounce cans of Welch's fruit drinks and delivery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases