BROWN v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION


539 P.2d 666 (1975)

Clark R. BROWN, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 25, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Ackerman, Springfield, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Babcock, Ackerman & Hanlon, Springfield.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for the respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FOLEY, JJ.


SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

The issue in this case is the same as in Evjen v. Employment Division, Or. App., 539 P.2d 662 (decided this date), and the principles stated there are controlling here.

Unlike in Evjen, the referee here concluded that he was not convinced by claimant's testimony to the effect that he was an active member of the labor market seeking all suitable employment. The referee's order reads in pertinent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases