LAUGHINGHOUSE v. AIELLO

No. 74-1326.

320 So.2d 869 (1975)

Julian E. LAUGHINGHOUSE, Appellant, v. Paul AIELLO et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 24, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl O. Koepke and Calvin Lenox, III, of Whitaker & Koepke & Assoc., Orlando, for appellant.

Monroe E. McDonald, of Sanders, McEwan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for appellees, Paul Aiello and Insurance Co. of North America.

Gary H. Rushmer and Jeffrey D. Keiner, of Akerman, Senterfitt, Eidson & Wharton, Orlando, for appellees, Robert L. Bailey and Amica Mut. Ins. Co.


DOWNEY, Judge.

The trial court directed a verdict against appellant in the trial of his personal injury suit because the evidence failed to prove any of the threshold requirements of the Florida Automobile Reparations Reform Act so as to entitle appellant to maintain this suit.

We have reviewed the evidence in detail and find that the testimony adduced by appellant and his medical witnesses was sufficient to create a jury question as to whether his medical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases