BLANKENSHIP v. STATE

No. CR 75-89.

527 S.W.2d 636 (1975)

Hubert BLANKENSHIP, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

September 22, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl Creekmore, Van Buren, for appellant.

Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., by Robert Newcomb, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.


FOGLEMAN, Justice.

Hubert Blankenship was found guilty of keeping, conducting and operating a gambling house in violation of Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-2001 (Repl.1964). On appeal, he first asserts that his conviction should be reversed because the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained through a search of Apartment 25 of the Van Buren Motel, the place where the state alleged he carried on the operation. The basis of the attack upon the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases