1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 398 F.Supp.
  5. 398 F.Supp. 756 (1975)
 

KEKER v. PROCUNIER

Civ. No. S-74-348.

398 F.Supp. 756 (1975)

John W. KEKER et al., Plaintiffs, v. R. K. PROCUNIER et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. California.

August 8, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Keker, pro se, and Kipperman, Shawn & Keker, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen. of California by William G. Prahl, Sacramento, Cal., for defendants.

OPINION

MacBRIDE, Chief Judge.

The primal issue presented by this case is whether attorneys at law may state a claim for violation of their rights to practice their chosen profession. This action was brought by two licensed California attorneys against officials of the California state correctional system pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Jurisdiction is afforded by Title 28 U.S.C. § 1343.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases