1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 231 N.W.2d
  5. 231 N.W.2d 919 (1975)
 

BECK v. CITY OF ST. PAUL

Nos. 45442, 45465 and 45466.

231 N.W.2d 919 (1975)

Joseph BECK, et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, Appellant, The Stuart Corporation, Appellant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 3, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pierre N. Regnier, City Atty., St. Paul, for appellant city.

Stacker & Ravich and R. J. Tansey, Jr., St. Paul, Robins, Davis & Lyons and Solly Robins, St. Paul, for Stuart Corp.

Firestone, Fink, Krawetz, Miley & Maas, James P. Miley, and William W. Fink, St. Paul, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

PETERSON, Justice.

These appeals present questions of importance in the law of municipal zoning. The city of St. Paul adopted an ordinance amending its zoning plan. Certain affected citizens challenged the validity of the zoning amendment. The trial court, ruling the new zoning ordinance invalid, enjoined any development of the area in issue that was inconsistent with the former zoning classification.

The property affected by the challenged zoning amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases