RATELLE v. SIEBEN

No. 44927.

226 N.W.2d 923 (1975)

Herman J. RATELLE, Respondent, v. Neil A. SIEBEN, et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 14, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Waters, Bloomington, for appellants.

Barnett, Ratelle, Hennessy, Vander Vort & Stasel and James H. Hennessy, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard before ROGOSHESKE, PETERSON and KELLY, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.


PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal from a post-trial order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, contending (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's special verdict consisting of its answers to five questions raised by disputed facts; and (2) that the court committed reversible error in its jury instructions, in failing to allow defendant Neil A. Sieben to express his opinion of the value of defendants' property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases