The defendant, Amerada Hess Corporation, is accused of an allegedly unauthorized "filling in" of waterfront property in violation of rule 3(b) of the Rules and Regulations of the New York City Department of Ports and Terminals.
The defendant corporation contends that it did not "fill in" the land within the meaning of rule 3(b). The defendant also contends that said rule 3(b) is defective...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
