HILTON v. MUMAW

Nos. 73-1077, 73-1131.

522 F.2d 588 (1975)

Henry HILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Henry MUMAW and Bethel Mumaw, his wife and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants-Appellees. Anthony HILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Henry MUMAW and Bethel Mumaw, his wife and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants-Appellees. Anthony HILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Henry MUMAW and Bethel Mumaw, his wife and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants-Appellants. Anthony HILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Henry MUMAW and Bethel Mumaw, his wife and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 4, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Piper (argued), Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellant.

Stanley J. Krause (argued), Aberdeen, Wash., for defendants-appellees.

Before DUNIWAY, INGRAHAM and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.


WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Anthony Hilton and Henry Hilton (Hiltons) brought this action against Henry and Bethel Mumaw (Mumaws),1 alleging claims of common law and equitable fraud and violations of Rev.Code Wash. § 21.20.010 and SEC Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. The alleged fraud was perpetrated in connection with contracts for the purchase of stock of Cohassett Beach Telephone Co. (Co-hassett). Jurisdiction in the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases