HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge.
Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to a term of life imprisonment.
Appellant's main point on appeal is that the circumstantial evidence of his guilt was insufficient to meet the requirements of the Circumstantial Evidence Rule.
We have examined the voluminous transcript of the trial and find that the evidence meets the Circumstantial Evidence Rule as set forth in Mayo v. State, Fla...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.