Defendant urges the reversal of his conviction upon two separate grounds. The first is that the actions of police officers in stopping his vehicle at the time of his initial apprehension were arbitrary and unreasonable and, thus, the subsequent warrantless search of his vehicle and the seizure of evidence therefrom was illegal. Secondly, he contends that his resulting confession should have been suppressed on the grounds of denial of counsel, involuntariness and unnecessary...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.