Claimant does not dispute his awareness of his former employer's rule against altercations among employees regardless of provocation, but contends that he did not strike a coemployee as was found by the board to have been the cause for his discharge. His argument is wholly unpersuasive. Substantial evidence supports this finding as it was based upon admissions, eyewitness testimony and circumstantial proof to the effect that claimant, during an argument with a coemployee...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
