1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 349 A.2d
  5. 349 A.2d 718 (1975)
 

PALMISANO v. RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

No. 295-75.

349 A.2d 718 (1975)

Samuel PALMISANO v. RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

November 7, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Davis, Associates, Inc., Barre, for plaintiff.

Downs, Rachlin & Martin, St. Johnsbury, for defendant.

Before BARNEY, C. J., and SMITH, DALEY, LARROW and BILLINGS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The jury, as a fact-finding component of the judicial system, has traditionally been the object of measures and requirements intended to preserve its impartiality. Concerns over possible prejudices influencing its deliberations in favor of, or against, one party or another have been a part of our case and statutory law for a very long time. See, e. g., 12 V.S.A. § 1947; State v. Brisson, 124 Vt. 211, 215, 201 A.2d 881

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases