1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 211 S.E.2d
  5. 211 S.E.2d 856 (1975)
 

THOMPSON v. CITY OF SALISBURY

No. 7419SC944.

211 S.E.2d 856 (1975)

24 N.C. App. 616

J. M. THOMPSON et al., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF SALISBURY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 19, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carlton, Rhodes & Thurston by Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for petitioner-appellants.

James A. Hudson, Salisbury, and Larry Ford, Davis, Ford & Weinhold, Salisbury, for respondent-appellee.

ARNOLD, Judge.

When, on the face of the record, the City has substantially complied with the statutory requirements for annexation, the burden is on petitioners to show by competent evidence a failure to meet these requirements. Dunn v. City of Charlotte, 284 N.C. 542, 201 S.E.2d 873 (1974); In re Annexation Ordinance by City of New Bern, 278 N.C. 641,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases