OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of delivery of heroin under the Controlled Substances Act, and the court assessed his punishment at ten years.
Appellant's sole ground of error is that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction since no illegal controlled substance was introduced at trial. Appellant argues that the substance introduced was never properly identified as heroin.
Ronald Tucker, an undercover narcotics...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
