1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 215 S.E.2d
  5. 215 S.E.2d 832 (1975)
 

STATE v. HACKETT

No. 7530SC223.

215 S.E.2d 832 (1975)

26 N.C. App. 239

STATE of North Carolina v. David HACKETT.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 18, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Gen. Robert P. Gruber, Raleigh, for the State.

Erwin & Beaty by James A. Beaty, Jr., and Richard C. Erwin, Winston-Salem, for defendant.

CLARK, Judge.

We have reviewed all assignments of error preserved by the defendant and find it would serve no useful purpose to discuss any of them except those which raise the following question: Did the trial court err in denying the motion to dismiss on the grounds that the State's delay in charging and arresting the defendant violated due process and his right to a speedy trial?

In Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases