Claimant was undisputedly paid by appellant, but appellant contends that respondent was the only employer, the payment arrangement having been worked out because respondent did not have a union contract. In addition, however, claimant testified that he had been told at the beginning that he was working for appellant, and some of the principal officers of appellant were relatives by blood or marriage of officers of respondent. Upon these factors the board could properly find...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
