The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The evidence presented to the Grand Jury, particularly as to the gross discrepancy in the number of toll tickets and the defendant's behavior when confronted by the police, was legally sufficient to support the indictment. (CPL 210.20; People v Dunleavy,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MAYO
36 N.Y.2d 1002 (1975)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ann Mayo, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted May 9, 1975.
Decided June 19, 1975.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER concur in memorandum; Judge FUCHSBERG dissents and votes to reverse in a separate opinion in which Judge COOKE concurs.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.