The claimant does not dispute that, in accepting benefits for various weeks between September 2, 1968 and September 30, 1972, he was being overpaid because he was actually working two days in each of such weeks which he did not report by proper notations upon his employment booklet. The claimant contended that he did not report the employment because of information which he had been given by interviewers when he reported to his local office. The claimant's excuse presented...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
