1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 511 F.2d
  5. 511 F.2d 524 (1975)
 

ROSS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE C. D. OF CAL.

No. 74-1919.

511 F.2d 524 (1975)

Michael S. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA including Messrs. Robert C. Bonner and Michael Sulner, Assistant and Deputy Attorney, Criminal Complaints, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 20, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael S. Ross, in pro. per.

Clarke A. Knicely, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before KOELSCH and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and RENFREW, District Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The well-settled principle that mandamus does not lie to compel a United States District Attorney to perform a discretionary act (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F.2d 375 (2nd Cir. 1973)) is dispositive of this appeal.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases