1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 536 P.2d
  5. 536 P.2d 496 (1975)
 

NEPOM v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

536 P.2d 496 (1975)

Ruth G. NEPOM, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided June 12, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris G. Galen of Tonkon, Torp & Galen, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Glen V. Sorensen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen. and James Manary, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

HOWELL, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse decree of the Oregon Tax Court in a suit involving the valuation of the improvements on plaintiff's real property for the tax years 1971 and 1972.

Plaintiff owns two parcels of real property in Multnomah County. The Assessment and Taxation Division of the county Department of Finance assessed the property as follows:

              January 1, 1971    January 1,...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases