Defendant moves to set aside the People's demand for the names and addresses of his alibi witnesses on the ground that the statute providing for same is unconstitutional. No supporting affidavit, exhibit, memorandum of law or even citation accompanies this motion. Defendant's attack is directed against CPL 250.20 which was amended in 1974 in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Wardius v Oregon, (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.