1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 211 S.E.2d
  5. 211 S.E.2d 809 (1975)
 

HARDY v. TOLER

No. 743SC913.

211 S.E.2d 809 (1975)

24 N.C. App. 625

Eddie HARDY, Jr. v. Charles L. TOLER and Pamlico Motor Company, a corporation.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 19, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ward & Ward by Jerry F. Waddell and Kennedy W. Ward, New Bern, for plaintiff-appellant.

Wilkinson & Vosburgh by John A. Wilkinson, Washington, for defendant-appellees.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Donald A. Davis, Raleigh, as amicus curiae, for the State.

BRITT, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in allowing defendants' motion for a directed verdict under Rule 50(b) as to the issue of punitive damages. We find no merit in this contention. Due to the similarity of the facts in this case to those presented in Clouse v. Motors, Inc., 17 N.C. App. 669, 195 S.E.2d 327 (1973), we think the principle of law applied in the plaintiff's appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases