BROCK, Chief Judge.
Defendant argues that it was error to allow the prosecuting witness to testify about the acts of violence without first fully establishing the identity of the perpetrator. This argument is feckless. Before describing what took place, the prosecuting witness identified defendant as the person who flagged him down. In any event the order of proof is in the discretion of the trial judge. State v. Franks,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.