1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 49 A.D.2d
  5. 49 A.D.2d 955 (1975)
 

MATTER OF KORNFELD v. COVENEY

49 A.D.2d 955 (1975)

In the Matter of Leo Kornfeld, Respondent, v. Frank Coveney et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, Respondents, and Edith Crosley, Appellant In the Matter of Frank P. De Luca, Appellant, v. Frank Coveney et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, et al., Respondents In the Matter of Edith Crosley, Appellant, v. Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 28, 1975

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

We have examined the buff cards of Leo Kornfeld, Hilda B. Morris and Cherry Berson and have taken judicial notice of the fact that these persons are enrolled Democrats. In view of the fact that they did not vote in a primary election this year which involved a contest for Surrogate, subdivision 10 of section 138 of the Election Law does not require that their signatures as subscribing witnesses on the nominating petitions of Leo Kornfeld...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases